Edward Corrie vs Cem Ilkel Estadísticas cara a cara
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L L W W L W W L L
Form
L W L W W L W W W LCara A Cara: Corrie 1 - 1 Ilkel
Ellas han jugado 4 conjuntos en total, con Corrie victoriosa 2 y Ilkel victoriosa 2. El último partido entre Corrie y Ilkel fue en el Loughborough Challenger, el 21-05-2018, Cuartos de First, I.hard, con Cem Ilkel obteniendo la victoria 6-3 6-4
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Edward Corrie | 1 |
| Cem Ilkel | 1 |
Loughborough Challenger(21-05-2018)
6
3
6
4
| Corrie | Estadísticas | Ilkel |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| Ret. | Ranking | 574 |
| 215 | Highest Rank | 144 |
| 37 | Age | 29 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 7 | Titles | 7 |
| 57% (308-229) | Total de Carrera V/D | 57% (437-334) |
| 0% (0-0) | Ganar/Perder | 78% (29-8) |
| $14,925 | Prize Money de Carrera | $225,530 |
| 0 | YTD Títulos | 2 |
| 1 | Dura H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Interior H2H | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Rybakina VS Svitolina PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Sakkari VS Paolini PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
26 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| GANADOR | PERDEDOR | MARCADOR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Cem Ilkel
Player
Edward Corrie
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
58%
(
29 of
50)
3
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
19 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
||||
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats
Edward Corrie
Player
Cem Ilkel
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
78%
(
14 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
55)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
||||
| Estadísticas | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Partidos cara a cara | 1 |
| 2 | Sets Ganados | 2 |
| 19 | Juegos Ganados | 17 |
| 7 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 1 | Faltas dobles totales | 3 |
| 1:0:5 | Tiempo promedio de partido | 1:0:5 |
| 59% (56/95) | % De Primer Servicio | 62% (67/108) |
| 75% (42/56) | % De Pts Ganados Con 1st Serv. | 70% (47/67) |
| 64% (25/39) | % De Pts Ganados Con 2nd Serv. | 61% (25/41) |
| 27% (3/11) | Puntos de quiebre ganados % (total) | 67% (2/3) |
| 33% (36/108) | % de ganancia de puntos devueltos | 29% (28/95) |
| 50% (1/2) | La mejor de 3 sets gana % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | La mejor de 5 sets gana % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | % de victorias en desempates (total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | % De Sets Decisivos Ganados | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1er set ganado, partido ganado | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1er set ganado, partido perdido | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1er set perdido, partido ganado | 0% (1/0) |
Las estadísticas mostradas actualmente incluyen partidos de todos los niveles. Para excluir eventos de nivel inferior (según las estadísticas oficiales de ATP / WTA), usa el botón de alternar en el pie de página.
Partidos Recientes Jugados Por Edward Corrie
Before:
| OPONENTE | MARCADOR | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Marius Copil
Player
Edward Corrie
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve %
70%
(
57 of
82)
6
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
84%
(
42 of
50)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
42 of
57)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
22 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
27 of
82)
83
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tobias Kamke
Player
Edward Corrie
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve %
66%
(
45 of
68)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Edward Corrie
Player
Jonathan Gray
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
51%
(
26 of
51)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
6 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
20 of
51)
56
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Edward Corrie
Player
Joshua Paris
74%
(
60 of
81)
1st Serve %
66%
(
59 of
89)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
39 of
59)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
25 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
89)
94
Total Points Won
76
|
4-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Evans
Player
Edward Corrie
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
0
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
30%
(
19 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
71
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Edward Corrie
Player
Jack Molloy
54%
(
32 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
68 of
101)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
40 of
68)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
25%
(
5 of
20)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
17 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
47 of
101)
89
Total Points Won
71
|
3-6 6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Edward Corrie
Player
Christian Harrison
74%
(
59 of
80)
1st Serve %
58%
(
49 of
84)
7
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
24 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
33 of
84)
89
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Edward Corrie
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
58%
(
29 of
50)
3
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
19 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Evans
Player
Edward Corrie
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
84)
3
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
2
81%
(
39 of
48)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
41 of
54)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
23 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
31 of
84)
81
Total Points Won
76
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Niels Desein
Player
Edward Corrie
66%
(
57 of
87)
1st Serve %
68%
(
59 of
87)
8
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
0
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
33%
(
29 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
32 of
87)
90
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(3) 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
Ver Más
Partidos Recientes Jugados Por Cem Ilkel
Before:
| OPONENTE | MARCADOR | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Saba Purtseladze
Player
Cem Ilkel
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve %
57%
(
40 of
70)
9
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
87%
(
40 of
46)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
17 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
25 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Evgenii Tiurnev
67%
(
56 of
83)
1st Serve %
55%
(
35 of
64)
2
Aces
12
0
Double Faults
3
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
26 of
35)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
30 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
23 of
64)
76
Total Points Won
71
|
2-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Michal Krajci
57%
(
35 of
61)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
11
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
6
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
22 of
29)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
18 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Kanan Gasimov
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
75)
8
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
76
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Saba Purtseladze
Player
Cem Ilkel
61%
(
47 of
77)
1st Serve %
76%
(
62 of
82)
11
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
39 of
62)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
24 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
31 of
82)
84
Total Points Won
75
|
6-1 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Matteo Lavizzari
58%
(
57 of
98)
1st Serve %
60%
(
59 of
99)
6
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
6
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
47 of
59)
56%
(
23 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
35%
(
34 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
35 of
99)
99
Total Points Won
98
|
6-4 2-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
David Poljak
61%
(
62 of
101)
1st Serve %
62%
(
68 of
110)
9
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
46 of
62)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
47 of
68)
64%
(
25 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
30%
(
30 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
41 of
110)
112
Total Points Won
99
|
6-7(3) 7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mert Alkaya
Player
Cem Ilkel
57%
(
35 of
61)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
58)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Henri Haupt
31%
(
4 of
13)
1st Serve %
73%
(
11 of
15)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
100%
(
4 of
4)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
89%
(
8 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
8%
(
1 of
13)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
10 of
15)
22
Total Points Won
6
|
5-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Stefanos Sakellaridis
Player
Cem Ilkel
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve %
56%
(
46 of
82)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
82)
76
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
Ver Más
Desglose De Estadísticas Contra Todos Los Oponentes H2H
| Estadísticas | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (308/229) | Win/Loss | 57% (437/334) |
| 57% (706/538) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (976/807) |
| 52% (6226/5640) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (8747/8216) |
| 53% (81/71) | Hard Win/Loss | 62% (287/178) |
| 53% (19/17) | Clay Win/Loss | 45% (57/71) |
| 64% (167/94) | Indoor Hard W/L | 55% (92/76) |
| 47% (41/47) | Grass Win/Loss | 10% (1/9) |
| 0.2 | Aces Per Game | 0.34 |
| 1187 | Aces Total | 2840 |
| 0.09 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 540 | Total Double Faults | 1378 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:14:59 |
| 602.49 | Average Opponent Rank | 531.68 |
| 61% (10188/16730) | 1st Serve % | 58% (23978/41029) |
| 71% (7235/10188) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (16866/23978) |
| 51% (3332/6542) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (8703/17051) |
| 37% (594/1588) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (1616/3998) |
| 38% (6466/17102) | Return Points Win % | 39% (16139/41486) |
| 33% (3/6) | Slam W/L | 32% (7/15) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 67% (2/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 32% (7/15) |
| 11% (1/8) | Main Tour W/L | 18% (5/23) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 47% (83/94) | Challenger W/L | 52% (175/159) |
| 65% (221/121) | Futures W/L | 67% (241/121) |
| 58% (306/532) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (425/752) |
| 0% (0/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 40% (4/10) |
| 51% (85/168) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (146/272) |
| 47% (80/172) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (130/232) |
| 83% (315/262) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (423/361) |
| 17% (315/52) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (423/60) |
| 20% (221/45) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (347/74) |
Otras predicciones
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
Si buscas predecir partidos de tenis o fútbol, ¡Matchstat.com lo tiene cubierto! Tenemos estadísticas de ligas, jugadores y equipos, y nos especializamos en estadísticas detalladas h2h entre jugadores de tenis o equipos de fútbol.
Todas nuestras predicciones se basan en el aprendizaje automático y la inteligencia artificial. Matchstat está diseñado para ayudarte en tus análisis y predicciones, pero la responsabilidad de tus predicciones finales es tuya.
Es bueno hablar... Ponte en contacto con nosotros [email protected]
